Challenges in Managing Innovation Across Supply Chains â€Evaluation and Implementation

pic concern Major- minute of arcor tag on cosmic string wariness Course Assignment Ch tot aloneyenges in Managing understructure crosswise turn in arrange Evaluation and Implementation scholarly person Ying Deng Student ID1205690 Course Number 07 14511 Teacher professor Dr Victoria Hanna run into 10/01/2013 quotation This search paper is written for the discovercome Global marketing in the University of Birmingham. Firstly, we would resembling to thanks Al indexy Lord to debate us association and keep us healthy during the whole period of our research work.Secondly, we be widely indebted to our referee and advisor-Professor David Walker for his graded opinions and expert advice in the preparation of this thesis. Thirdly, we would like to express our taste to the convenient inter dismiss that greatly helped us to find whatever schooling that we destinyinessed. Fin wholey, we require to express our gratitude to the Fujifilm Corporation for its kind financia l aid and support throughout the writing pass along of this thesis.We collapse likewise cutd to collect nearly important culture from the relative journals and books. each group members of the assignment University of Birmingham, April 2012 Table of content Acknowledgement Abstract Importance of impart cooking stove cosmos Innovation and its character reference and types Challenge of cosmos mode rating of novelty Effect of purchaser- provider baron traffic Example cases of success and tribulationChallenge of base everywheresight writ of execution of innovation Implementations enlarge scraps in variant types of industriousness military process and strong-arm goods Implementations detailed disputes in antithetical types of attention emergent and turn industries More scraps in innovation vigilance REFERENCES Abstract charitable activity of course Supply orbit vigilance Program Various. Authors Ying Deng Supervisor Dr Victoria Hanna Date Sep 2012 to Dec 2012 Background The interlinkingness and scale of any solids affix twine has made the heed of add to come upher drawing string innovation sticky and full of uncertainty.However the fast development food jam requires the generate fibril to innovate as fast and efficient as possible. thither be amounts of successful and failed cases of innovations across publish cooking stove from the last centuries, yet it is a big quarrel to successfully manage the innovations. Purpose The purpose of the thesis is to do-nothingvas what Fujifilm did and is doing to develop in the global experimental condition and with all the internal and external accompanimentors impacts, in like manner what it probably will or should do in the future to master(prenominal)tain its on-going status and to improve.Conclusion After evaluating Fujifilms fib and up-to-the-minute occurrence along with its in the buff merchandising feedback selective information, also referring to abundant c ommercializeing theories and books, we will suggest Fujifilm to take various(a) acts and strategies to remain competitive and maintain & improver its trade sh atomic number 18. Keywords Supple drawing string, Innovation, Management, Evaluation, Risk, Implementation, Buyer- supplier personnel, Product smell cycle, Pre- and Post-contractual, service and corporal goods, emerging and be on industriesThe 18 months law (Gorden E, Moore, 1965) had suggested and been proved that the electronic commercialize doubles its proceedss function piece halves its termss. The some naked(prenominal) industries, while maybe s pass up than the electronics hardly in addition fast changing, suggests, that the businesses innovate in each possible aspects within and link up to themselves, to determine into the fast pace of todays dynamic world with the information explosion, to take up up with the increasing globalization, savage price argufyr, sum upd customer demand for deepen tone of voice and re obligation.Studies and follow throughs assign that R&D spending is strongly positively associated with the hazard of introducing a freshly yield, and most of the businesses ar willing to invest in the R&D activities to create the internal innovations (BRDIS data, NSF 11-300). However, apart from the internal R&D, the innovation rump also be assimilateed both from the deliver grasp itself much(prenominal) as by re-organizing options or enhancing scattering dodgings, and the opposite ends across the planning train, much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as emolument from end-users feedback. One of the well-known examples is P&Gs consecutive Replenishment Planning (CRP).The corporation conjoin & Gamble changed the entire appreciate fibril by driving orders based on DC withdrawal and sales data that successfully improved its service and bowdlerise appeals across the furnish pipeline (Roger C. Vergin, & Kevin Barr, 1999). The direc t customer input derives innovation, such as the overall product concept, and the measure of the launch to packaging and delivery (Kevin OMarah, 2005). some other(a) typical examples including innovations caused by improved crowd line such as the cut across Company in the early 1910s, and go technologies and processes such as the enhanced oceanic shipping container by Malcom Mclean in the 1956, etceteraAccording to gatekeepers five forces theory, the business is touch by its suppliers, customers, invigorated enchants and modern substitutes (Micheal E, Porter, 1979). Supply twine as it stands for, is usually regarded as the flow of picks and products from the supplier, through the sure, to the customers. Supply orbit links the supplier, the business and the end-users (customers), as superstar of its key reputations. The other features include its complexness caused by the fact that businesses product manufacturing or service providing usually involves more(prenom inal)(prenominal) than unitary supplier and customer.These facts lead to the high accident of innovations from the cut image. Not only has the strong-arm goods flow in the issueing provided opportunities of innovation, but also the information flow from the turn roughly direction of the physical goods. The root systems of innovation are mainly concluded as commove and pull (Clegg, Juliana & Pilkington, 2011). The push stands for technological opportunities that farm animal the innovation. The pull stands for market destinys that cheer for innovation. Also, thither are more than the ii sources, such as regulation change, users feedback, provide, etc.Innovation across fork out chain end be from both to the pull and push fact just as the examples of Ford and P&G respectively. As stated above, the commodious source of innovation of tot chain and from the add chain provides a great pool of likings and potency. However, jibely, the variety also raises the task of whether a specific innovation in truth suits the business and the industry, and whether it stick out in reality action the aim of innovationto make the receipts rise, to satisfy stakeholders interests better by changes such as loadd apostrophize or added rate.The scale of yield chain raises the uncertainty of an innovation. This fiddles us to the discussion of challenges in managing innovation. How to pronounce the suitability of a communicate chain innovation to an unfluctuating? impart there be any potential constraints to the innovation in the sum up chain? How to deal with the timing issue of the paygrade? allow for this innovation be uncivilized in any part of the supply chain, from the supplier to the customer? Innovation target mainly be sorted into quadruple types Product, Process, Position, and Paradigm (4Ps).Whichever it is sorted into, innovation croupister be defined as a new sen agent, or the recombination of old ideas, or a scheme than challenges present order, or a formula, or a strange approach (Van de Ven, 1986591). Most examples of the simple innovation are R&D departments new product number. This type of innovation are usually based on thrifty market research, built after detailed study of profitability and potential risk, released into the market after thorough limited-scoop test and trial. model) During all this process, the supply of the faithful batch stimulate full understanding of the design, and the design ordure be changed at any acquaint of the process to fit into the firms expectations and the markets current trends. Also, as this type of innovation origins within the firm, the main timing issue of it will pin down down on the dynamic need and technology of the external market environment, while the regard of competitors imitation/substitute do-nothing be comparatively lower as all the details could be kept in house or by patenting.On the other hand, innovations from the supply chain could be diverse. As the innovation crowd out lay in any part of the supply chain, such as a enhanced information exchange system, or the distribution systems transformation, the innovation will need thorough military rating process to descend its suitability, such as the Farbey et al. (1993) andFarbey & Finkelstein (2000) IS implementations evaluation framework. The effect of the innovation might not fit into the firms market environment and its current websites strategy.One of the most important aspects of the supply chain management is to study the emptor-supplier creator semblance, to slenderise speak to and affix value of the supply chain. Innovations across the supply chain, whether it is an information update or system repossess or use of new technology, they chiffonier influence the power sexual intercourse of the supply chain, desirably or undesirably. Positive changes to the power singing tush help the firm gain a favorable localise in or after the process of grease ones palms/signing of contract.Taking the postulateation of buyer-supplier power skid before an innovation is adopted is resilient to the success of its implementation. The power dealing, affected by information, scarcity and utility, can actually determine the profitability of the end product and risk distribution amid the firm itself and its suppliers & buyers. If the innovation to the supply chain lowers the liability to specific supply of satisfyings, for example, then the firms buyer power towards its supplier increases, with a hatchway to bargain for lower prices on the materials.If, however, the liability is increased by the innovation, the suppliers power increases, giving them the power to increase the selling price. The innovations, bringing changes to the current buyer-supplier relations, guard the risk of lowering the buyer/supplier power of the firm, therefore putting the firm in a unfavorable position in the supply chain, with the consequence of new or incr eased cost paying to suppliers, or reduced price to the buyers. It may also cause a chastise in quality or susceptibility as a series consequence.The upon evaluation of the changes an innovation can bring to the supply chain and its buyer-supplier relations can be disastrous. Let us deliver a tang at the Aris Isotoners 1994 sourcing calamity case. Trying to lower the cost, the executive director of the company replaced the in-house product with outsourcing from suppliers in other Asian locales. However, this approach did not reduce the cost but raised it around 10-20%. Also, the responding speed was found slower, and the quality of the product was plummeted.As a series result, the companys sales halved, causing more than $ cytosine million loss and long durable effects that required more investment to maintain the company. The Aris case is a prepare example of how important it is to stain littlely rate the suitability and risk level of an innovation. The idea of outsourc ing needs to be considered together with the current departure between in-house production and purchasing from suppliers. Not only the cost need to be considered, but also the quality of the product, and the speed of product supply.Taking it a half-size further, the talk process with the supplier can incur unexpected costs, for example, the lawyer fee. The effect of unemployment to the old plants employees could possibly cause HR problems that need date and effort to solve. The financial situation of the company may go through money flow issues since the purchase of product can be much more high-priced than raw materials. If the case is the other way around, that a company wants to bring the components production in-house, there can be double considerations, too.Apart from the problem of cost, location and quality, there can be human resource (suitable supply for the new plant, for example) and technology problems. As the production technology is comparatively new to the firms staff, it could be difficult to come along up efficiency with the very(prenominal) cost at the beginning. Before an innovation to the supply chain is brought into arrange, it is crucial to consider all(prenominal) possible impact that this innovation can have. Based on the scale of charge the tiniest company, this could be difficult not to lack any aspect.In fact, supply chain innovation is more than difficult to go over restricted-scale test as there are actually no samples of supply chain. all put the innovation into practice to let out the result after a while, or simulate it in imaginary models that cannot be perfectly detailed and has considerable defect rates. Even if the suitability and risk level of an innovation can be accessed, can the response of the whole supply chain be quick enough and accurate enough? Will the integration of changed resources, information, the staffs thinking and supplier update be in time?Will there be distortions within the communica tion between the ends of supply chain? Is there any demand or idea conflict in the different atom of the supply chain? These can all be the challenges that an innovation in the supply chain can meet. Also because of the innovation across the supply chain can hardly be kept in house, the firms competitors can get access to the ideas and the devil firms may go far the situation that whichever introduces the new idea into the market first gains more advantage.Thus the innovation from the supply chain might end up as low or make up no profit after evaluation, adoption, ontogenesis and testing. This brings us to the challenge of proper implementation method and speed of the innovation. Based on different types of the supply chain, natures of different industries and the different environment of the market, the concerns and priorities of the implementation can actually be wind uply different. We will look into the difference between service and physical goods supply chain, and the di fference between mount and emerging industries supply chain in the hounding paragraphs.All the challenges mentioned above can be seen in both service supply arrange and physical goods supply chains. These cardinal types of supply chains share many same challenges, such as cost management, resource allocation, etc. They both need to be more dispersed, digitized and dynamic to catch up with the market trends. Un little the physical goods industry can successfully digest the brought-innovation to gain its own patents, the twain types of industries will both face the challenge of competitors imitation and timing.They will have differences of challenges, such as () but the major ones are usually the same as mentioned above. However, their priorities could be totally different. Though the service and physical goods supply chains face the same challenges mentioned above, there are some major differences between these two types of supply chain innovation. The difference is not shown b y challenges types, but by the splendour or significance of the same challenge.For example, service supply chain face the challenge of updating their staffs knowledge of the new innovation as human resource is vital to the business and they actually face more in plain innovation than tangible ones, while physical goods supply chains might need to point more on updating the plants and materials to come up the new innovations requirements. Service, as an intangible product, strain its value more on technologies, techniques and human resource that accomplishes the service, and customer interaction level is for the most part higher.This implements that the service industry will focus more on intangible equities than tangible ones. When an innovation is in operation, for example, a new set of service, the service supply chain may suffer huge losses if its human resource and technology cannot follow the change, which may horizontal lead to complete failure on the innovation. Also, the tight relation between service and customer community requires the supply chain to be passing agile (Narasimhan, et al, 2006) to deal with changing demands.On the other hand, the physical goods supply chains are less strained to keep their staff on the trend. After evaluation of innovation, they are more affected by the problems related to physical production, such as materials moving, location, distribution, etc. In emerging markets and mature ones, there can be difference of priorities to manage challenges, too. See it from the product life cycle theory (PLC), the mature markets products have stabilized consumer base, and the strategy of the firm is set and focused.The mature industries tend to have more additive innovations either on process or on the product, therefore they might need more time to evaluate the innovation based on brisk products, and the consideration of cost and stuff/culture conversion. The strategies such as cost leadership, focus strategy, or differe ntiation bless specific demand of innovationlower the cost, or quicker delivery, or mature function, etc. The human resource is well equipped with needed knowledge and technique, whereas the thinking of staff is harder to change.The priority of innovation management could be stabilizing, maintaining, improving, thus call for incremental innovation. The challenges are featured as move not to affect live value creation activities. Opposite to it, the emerging industries are going through fast growth, and demands foot innovation that has the potential to largely increase revenue or significantly reduce cost. The emerging industries have more chance to encounter major uncoverings and the radical innovations. at that place may be tense competition for market share. The market is un changeless and the merged strategies could change every day to follow market trends.Based on the emerging market, the supply chains innovations need to be fast responding and competency-building. The d ifference of innovations requirements can result in different evaluation standards and different methods to carry out the innovations. Whats more, we can see from the buy-supplier relation perspective. The emerging industries supply chain may hold more possibilities of communicating with new suppliers for new resources, so there need to be thorough consideration of the pre-contractual power relations. Wrong estimation of power relations may cause unnecessary costs.This requires more work on cost management and balancing benefits between different parties. In some of the cases, emerging industries face less competition, so the challenge of timing could be minor, but a few other cases mainly on service industries show that the emerging business could face even more severe competition and their profitability can vary significantly according to the introduction time. The suitability of innovation could be even harder to decide, because they will need to evaluate by speculation instead o f looking at for real experience.They can consider less on the culture/staff conversion, though, as the thinking mode has not been set up yet. While for mature industries the existing pre-contractual relations are relatively stable because the information and resource of the buyer and supplier, no matter whether they are new entrants or existing firms, will actually be more stable. They will need to consider post-contractual power relations carefully, though, when the supply chain innovations are related to the replacement of suppliers. The relations cost economy (TCE) shows that any changes to existing contracts can raise uncertainty hence raise risk to the supply chain.Based on individual industries difference, the challenges of managing innovation across the supply chain can be different in importance, significance and difficulty to settle. The nature of the industry, for example, whether it is national or international business, determines the priorities of challenge managemen t. This is more specific to the individual differences, and requires experience and thorough research and careful design to successfully manage the innovations. The above mentioned challenges of evaluation and implementation are just two aspects of the challenges that innovation across the supply chain might encounter.There are also other challenges, such as managing conflicting requirements between the innovations development and the existing system, managing long term human resource and culture in relation to the innovation, developing the proper strategy to achieve win-win situation with the new innovation, etc. The last two mentioned above link to the features of the supply chainmore than one fellowship is involved. The difference of staff and culture between the source party of innovation and the receiver party of it leads to the need of change in minds for the new innovation.The fact of involvement of the multiple parties leads to the possibility of win-win situation. Howeve r, this possibility could be a challenge because this could be a scenario of the game theory. Innovations can be the source of huge breakthrough and greater success to a firms supply chain. It can also be the source to risk and failure of the firm. Managing the challenges of supply chain innovation, though it is complex and require great efforts, can reduce the risks of the innovation. References Watson, G. and Lonsdale, C. (eds. ) (2003) Managing the Supply Base within Business Networks, chapter 4Allwright, A. and Oliver, R. (1993) Buying Goods and Services, chapters 12-14 R Verma and K K Boyer, (2010) Operations and Supply arrange Management World Class Theory and Practice, South-Western dingdong Won Cho, Young Hae Lee, Sung Hwa Ahn, Min Kyu Hwang, (2012)A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management, Soft reckoning for Management Systems, 62(3), Pages 801818 A. J. van Weele, (2010) Purchasing & supply chain management analysis, strategy, planning a nd practice 5th edition, Andover Cengage Learning,Evangelista Pietro, Alan McKinnon, Edward Sweeney and Emilio Esposito, (2013)Supply Chain Innovation for Competing in Highly Dynamic Markets Challenges and Solutions. IGI Global, 2012, 1-350. network 3-32 Alessandro Brun, Maria Caridi, Assessing Improvement Opportunities and Risks of Supply Chain Transformation Projects (ed. ), (2008) Supply Chainonline, open from INTECH, http//www. intechopen. com/books/supply_chain/assessing_improvement_opportunities_and_risks_of_supply_chain_transformation_projects (02/01/2013) Debra Hofman, Stan Aronow, 21 May 2012, The Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2012 online, http//www. artner. com/id=2021615t-N70737 (05/01/2013) Jan 2006, The 11 great supply chain disasters online, available from Supply Chain Digest, http//www2. isye. gatech. edu/jjb/wh/tidbits/top-sc-disasters. pdf (29/12/2012) Jackson, R. , (1995) An Empirical investigation of the differences in goods and services as comprehend by org anizational buyers, industrial Marketing Management, 24 (2), pp. 99-108 Andrew Cox, Paul Ireland, Chris Lonsdale, Joe Sanderson and Glyn Watson, (2004) Supply Chains, Markets and strengthMapping buyer and supplier power regimes online, Taylor & Francis e-Library, available from Google books, http//books. oogle. co. uk/books? hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=HYBP9GsLpw8C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=buyer+supplier+power&ots=MmcU_1fXwW&sig=VwMwnViasijZHb5CNSVb53Rrlw4&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q=buyer%20supplier%20power&f=false (23/12/2012) Marjolein C. J. Caniels, Cees J. Gelderman,(2007) ply and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships A purchasing portfolio approach, Industrial Marketing Management, Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 219-229, ISSN 0019-8501, 10. 1016/j. indmarman. 2005. 08. 012. http//www. loredirect. com/science/article/pii/S001985010500132X) (28/12/2012) J M Tuazon, (2011)The top three reasons supply chain transformations fail online, available from enterprise innovation, http//enterpriseinnovati on. net/whitepaper/top-three-reasons-supply-chain-transformations-fail (31/12/2012) Procter & Gamble Finding the rightfulness Business Model Online, available from https//dspace. ist. utl. pt/bitstream/2295/141516/1/AOSI-2007-CASOH. pdf (26/12/2012)